Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-42gr6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-20T09:18:52.727Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Oases in the Desert: Hannah Arendt on Democratic Politics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2013

Jeffrey C. Isaac
Affiliation:
Indiana University, Bloomington

Abstract

Hannah Arendt never wrote systematically on the subject of democracy. In her book of greatest relevance to the subject, On Revolution, she criticized liberal democracy, and defended a conception of virtuous political “elites,” leading most commentators to view her as an opponent of democracy. I argue that Arendt defended a distinctive conception of grass-roots democracy, and that her conception of elites is distinctively democratic rather than anti-democratic. I bolster this argument by examining her historical context, and conclude by assessing the relevance of Arendt's conception of democracy.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ackerman, Bruce, 1992. The Future of Liberal Revolution. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Arato, Andrew, and Cohen, Jean. 1984. “Social Movements, Civil Society, and the Problem of Sovereignty.” Praxis international 4:266–83.Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah. 1953. “The Ex-Communists.” Commonweal 57:595–99.Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah. 1958. The Human Condition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah. 1959. “Reflections on Little Rock.” Dissent 6:4556.Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah. 1968a. Men in Dark Times. New York: Harcourt.Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah. 1968b. The Origins of Totalitarianism. New York: Harcourt.Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah. 1972. Crises of the Republic. New York: Harcourt.Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah. 1977a. On Revolution. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah. 1977b. Between Past and Future. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah. 1979. “On Hannah Arendt.” In Hannah Arendt: The Recovery of the Public World, ed. Hill, Melvyn. New York: St. Martin's.Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah. 1982. Lectures on Kant's Political Philosophy. Ed. Beiner, Ronald. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ash, Timothy Garton. 1990. The Uses of Adversity: Essays on the Fate of Central Europe. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Barber, Benjamin. 1985. Strong Democracy. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Benda, Vaclav et al. , 1988. “Parallel Polis; or, An Independent Society in Central and Eastern Europe: An Inquiry.” Social Research 55:211–46.Google Scholar
Boyte, Harry. 1980. The Backyard Revolution: Understanding the New Citizen Movement. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Boyte, Harry. 1990. Commonwealth. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Camus, Albert. 1947. The Plague. New York: Modern Library.Google Scholar
Canovan, Margaret. 1978. “The Contradictions of Hannah Arendt's Political Thought.” Political Theory 6:526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahl, Robert A. 1956. A Preface to Democratic Theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert A. 1961. Who Governs? New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert A. 1989. Democracy and Its Critics. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Dewey, John. 1927. The Public and Its Problems. Chicago: Swallow.Google Scholar
Esping-Andersen, Gosta. 1985. Politics Against Markets: The Social-Democratic Road to Power. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Evans, Sara, and Boyte, Harry. 1986. Free Spaces: The Sources of Democratic Change in America. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Fraser, Nancy. 1989. Unruly Practices: Power, Discourse, and Gender in Contemporary Social Theory. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Fukuyama, Francis. 1989. “The End of History.” National Interest 16:318.Google Scholar
Goldfarb, Jeffrey C. 1989. Beyond Glasnost: The Post-totalitarian Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Goldfarb, Jeffrey C. 1992. After the Fall: The Pursuit of Democracy in Central Europe. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 1987. The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity. 1987. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 1989. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 1991. The New Conservatism: Cultural Criticism and the Historians' Debate. Cambridge: M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
Hampsher-Monk, Ian. 1983. “The Historical Study of Democracy.” In Democratic Theory and Practice, ed. Duncan, Graeme. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hanson, Russell. 1985. The Democratic Imagination in America. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanson, Russell. 1989. “Democracy.” In Political Innovation and Conceptual Change, ed. Ball, Terence, Farr, James, and Hanson, Russell. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Harrington, Michael. 1989. Socialism: Past and Future. New York: Arcade.Google Scholar
Havel, Vaclav. 1987. Living in Truth. London: Faber & Faber.Google Scholar
Havel, Vaclav. 1990. Disturbing the Peace. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Havel, Vaclav. 1992a. Open Letters: Selected Writings, 1965–1990. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Havel, Vaclav. 1992b. Summer Meditations. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Honig, Bonnie. 1992. “Toward an Agonistic Feminism: Hannah Arendt and the Politics of Identity.” In Feminists Theorize the Political, ed. Butler, Judith and Scott, Joan W.. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Isaac, Jeffrey C. 1992. Arendt, Camus, and Modern Rebellion. New Haven: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Isaac, Jeffrey C. 1993. “Civil Society and the Spirit of Revolt.” Dissent 40(3):16.Google Scholar
Jay, Martin. 1978. “Hannah Arendt.” Partisan Review 45:348–68.Google Scholar
Kaldor, Mary, ed. 1991. Europe from Below: An East–West Dialogue. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Kateb, George. 1983a. “Arendt and Representative Democracy.” Salmagundi 60:2059.Google Scholar
Kateb, George. 1983b. Hannah Arendt: Politics, Conscience, Evil. Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Allanheld.Google Scholar
Keane, John. 1988. Democracy and Civil Society. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Kirchheimer, Otto. 1966. “Germany: The Vanishing Opposition.” In Political Opposition in Western Democracies, ed. Dahl, Robert A.. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Kiss, Elisabeth. 1992. “Democracy Without Parties?Dissent 39(2):2631.Google Scholar
Lefort, Claude. 1986. The Political Forms of Modern Society. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.Google Scholar
Lowi, Theodor. 1969. The End of Liberalism. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Macdonald, Dwight. 1946. “The Root Is Man: Part Two.” politics 3:194214.Google Scholar
McKenna, George. 1984. “Bannisterless Politics: Hannah Arendt and Her Children.” History of Political Thought 5:333–60.Google Scholar
Megiil, Alan. 1985. Prophets of Extremity. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michels, Robert. 1962. Political Parties: A Sociological Study of the Oligarchical Tendencies of Modern Democracy. New York: Crowell–Collier.Google Scholar
Miller, James. 1979. “The Pathos of Novelty: Hannah Arendt's Image of Freedom in the Modern World.” In Hannah Arendt: The Recovery of the Public World, ed. Hill, Melvyn. New York: St. Martin's.Google Scholar
Mills, C. Wright. 1956. The Power Elite. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mills, C. Wright. 1959. The Sociological Imagination. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Neumann, Franz. 1957. The Democratic and the Authoritarian State. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Pateman, Carole. 1970. Participation and Democratic Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pennock, J. Roland. 1979. Democratic Political Theory. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Schattschneider, E. E. 1960. The Semi-sovereign People. Hinsdale, IL: Dryden.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Carl. 1988. The Crisis of Parliamentary Democracy. Trans. Kennedy, Ellen. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, Joseph. 1947. Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Sitton, John F. 1987. “Hannah Arendt's Argument for Council Democracy.” Polity 20:80100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skilling, H. Gordon. 1981. Charter 77 and Human Rights in Czechoslovakia. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Skinner, Quentin. 1973. “The Empirical Theorists of Democracy and Their Critics: A Plague on Both Their Houses.” Political Theory 4:287306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sumner, Gregory. 1992. “Window on the First New Left: Dwight Macdonald's politics Magazine, 1944–1949.” Ph.D. diss. Indiana University, Bloomington.Google Scholar
Touraine, Alain. 1989. “Social Movements, Revolution, and Democracy.” In The Public Realm: Essays on Discursive Types in Political Philosophy, ed. Schurmann, Reiner. New York: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Walzer, Michael. 1991. “Constitutional Rights and the Shape of Civil Society.” In The Constitution of the People: Reflections on Citizens and Civil Society, ed. Calvert, Robert E.. Lawrence: Kansas University Press.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. 1978. “Parliament and Government in a Reconstructed Germany (a Contribution to the Critique of Officialdom and Party Politics).” In Economy and Society, ed. Roth, Guenther and Wittich, Claus. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Westbrook, Robert R. 1991. John Dewey and American Democracy. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
White, Stephen K. 1991. Political Theory and Postmodernism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, James D. 1981. The Intellectual Resistance in Europe. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wolin, Richard. 1990. The Politics of Being: The Political Thought of Martin Heidegger. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolin, Sheldon. 1983. “Hannah Arendt: Democracy and the Political.” Salmagundi 60:319.Google Scholar
Young-Bruehl, Elisabeth. 1982. Hannah Arendt: For Love of the World. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar