Skip to main content
Log in

governmentality and political studies

  • Research
  • Published:
European Political Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Often overlooked by political scientists, Foucault's later work on ‘governmentality’ has much to offer political analysis. This paper does three things. First, it highlights three different meanings that Foucault and others give to this term. Second, it reviews some of the key debates – such as the nature of liberal governance – surrounding studies of governmentality. Finally, it illustrates the analytical promise of a governmentality perspective through a short discussion of recent developments in European governance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. This argument certainly has certain similarities to the term ‘governance’ as it is used today by political scientists. Stoker, for instance, identifies such characteristics of governance as ‘the blurring of boundaries and responsibilities for tackling social and economic issues’ and the presence of ‘autonomous self-governing networks’ (Stoker, 1998: 18). But in many common uses of the term, governance is presented as a relatively recent development, a sort of ‘de-statisation’ of government often associated with the programme of neo-liberalism and the process of globalisation. It is worth noting that for Foucault government has always been heterogeneous and plural. For instance, even within the most bureaucratic and centralised welfare states there was a government of the social which operated also through the government and self-government of the family.

  2. See the essays collected in Burchell et al, (1991).

  3. The following paragraphs draw on Walters and Haahr (2005: chapters 2 and 6).

References

  • Barry, A. (1994) ‘Harmonisation and the Art of European Government’, in C. Rootes and H. Davis (eds.) Social Change and Political Transformation, London: UCL Press, pp. 39–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barry, A. (1996) ‘Lines of Communication and Space of Rule’, in A. Barry, T. Osborne and N. Rose (eds.) Foucault and Political Reason: Liberalism, Neo-liberalism, and Rationalities of Government, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 123–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barry, A. (2001) Political Machines: Governing a Technological Society, London: Athlone.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bigo, D. (2002) ‘Security and Immigration: Toward a Critique of the Governmentality of Unease’, Alternatives 27 (1): 63–92; (supplement).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burchell, G. (1991) ‘Peculiar Interests: Civil Society and Governing ‘The System of Natural Liberty’’, in G. Burchell, C. Gordon and P. Miller (eds.) The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 119–150.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Burchell, G., Gordon, C. and Miller, P. (eds.) (1991) The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Butler, J. (2004) Precarious Life: The Powers of Mourning and Violence, London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cruikshank, B. (1996) ‘Revolutions Within: Self-Esteem and Self-Government’, in A. Barry, T. Osborne and N. Rose (eds.) Foucault and Political Reason: Liberalism, Neo-liberalism, and Rationalities of Government, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 231–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cruikshank, B. (1999) The Will to Empower: Democratic Citizens and Other Subjects, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dean, M. (1999) Governmentality: Power and Rule in Modern Society, London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dean, M. (2002) ‘Liberal Government and Authoritarianism’, Economy and Society 31 (1): 37–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dean, M. and Hindess, B. (1998) ‘Introduction: Government, Liberalism, Society’, in M. Dean and B. Hindess (eds.) Governing Australia: Studies in Contemporary Rationalities of Government, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillon, M. and Reid, J. (2000) ‘Global Liberal Governance: Biopolitics, Security and War’, Millennium 30 (1): 41–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, I. (1999) ‘Globalisation as Governance: Toward an Archaeology of Contemporary Political Reason’, in A. Prakash and J. Hart (eds.) Globalisation and Governance, London: Routledge, pp. 134–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewald, F. (1991) ‘Insurance and Risk’, in G. Burchell, C. Gordon, and P. Miller (eds.) The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 197–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finnemore, M. and Sikkink, K. (2001) ‘Taking Stock: The Constructivist Research Program in International Relations and Comparative Politics’, Annual Review of Political Science 4, 391–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1983) ‘The Subject and Power’, in H. Dreyfus and P. Rabinow (eds.) Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 208–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1991) ‘Governmentality’, in G. Burchell, C. Gordon and P. Miller (eds.) The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 87–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1997) ‘Security, Territory and Population’, in P. Rabinow (ed.) Michel Foucault: Ethics, Subjectivity and Truth, Vol. 1, New York: New Press, pp. 67–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamble, A. (1988) The Free Economy and the Strong State: The Politics of Thatcherism, Basingstoke: Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, C. (1991) ‘Governmental Rationality: An Introduction’, in G. Burchell, C. Gordon and P. Miller (eds.) The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 1–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haahr, J.H. (2004) ‘Open Coordination as Advanced Liberal Government’, Journal of European Public Policy 11 (2): 209–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardt, M. and Negri, A. (2000) Empire, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hindess, B. (1998) ‘Neo-Liberalism and the National Economy’, in M. Dean and B. Hindess (eds.) Governing Australia: Studies in Contemporary Rationalities of Government, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 210–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hindess, B. (2000) ‘Divide and Govern’, in R. Ericson and N. Stehr (eds.) Governing Modern Societies, Toronto: University of Toronto Press, pp. 118–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hindess, B. (2001) ‘The Liberal Government of Unfreedom’, Alternatives 26, 93–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larner, W. and Walters, W. (2004) ‘Introduction: Global Governmentality’, in W. Larner and W. Walters (eds.) Global Governmentality: Governing International Spaces, London: Routledge, pp. 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemke, T. (2001) ‘The Birth of Biopolitics’, Michel Foucault's Lecture at the Collège de France on Neo-Liberal Governmentality’, Economy and Society 30 (2): 190–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levi-Strauss, C. (1966) The Savage Mind, London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lui-Bright (1997) ‘International/National: Sovereignty, Governmentality and International Relations’, in Australasian Political Studies, Proceedings of the 1997 APSA Conference, Adelaide, Flinders University of South Australia, pp. 581–597.

  • Monnet, J. (1978) Memoirs, Garden City, NJ: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Malley, P. (1996) ‘Risk and Responsibility’, in A. Barry, T. Osborne and N. Rose (eds.) Foucault and Political Reason: Liberalism, Neo-liberalism, and Rationalities of Government, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 189–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pasquino, P. (1991) ‘Criminology: The Birth of a Special Knowledge’, in G. Burchell, C. Gordon and P. Miller (eds.) The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 235–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poulantzas, N. (1978) State, Power, Socialism, London: New Left Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, N. (1996) ‘The Death of the Social? Refiguring the Territory of Government’, Economy and Society 25 (3): 327–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, N. (1999) Powers of Freedom: Reframing Political Thought, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, J. (1998) Seeing like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition have Failed, New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, J. (1997) ‘Governing Through Crime’, in L. Friedman and G. Fisher (eds.) The Crime Conundrum; Essays in Criminal Justice, Boulder, CO: Westview, pp. 171–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoker, G. (1998) ‘Governance as Theory: Five Propositions’, International Social Science Journal 50 (155): 187–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tully, J. (1999) ‘The Agonic Freedom of Citizens’, Economy and Society 28 (2): 161–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veyne, P. (1997) ‘Foucault revolutionises History’, in A. Davidson (ed.) Foucault and his Interlocutors, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 146–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waever, O. (1995) ‘Securitisation and Desecuritisation’, in R. Lipschutz (ed.) On Security, New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 46–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walters, W. (2000) Unemployment and Government: Genealogies of the Social, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Walters, W. and Haahr, J.H. (2005) Governing Europe: Discourse, Governmentality and European Integration, London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Walters, W., Haahr, J. governmentality and political studies. Eur Polit Sci 4, 288–300 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.eps.2210038

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.eps.2210038

Keywords

Navigation