Abstract
This article revisits the early realist understanding of tragedy in international relations in order to highlight its debt to continental philosophical thought and tragic theology. Far from sharing a view of tragedy as objective externality, early realists engaged with the existential conditions that make up the paradoxical structure of experience: human beings’ constant albeit frustrated striving to make the world intelligible and ascribe meaning to their actions. The upshot of this article is that early classical realists, such as Hans Morgenthau and Reinhold Niebuhr, entertained a view of tragedy as a necessary fiction, that is, a fabricated but real condition that is inextricably linked with the constitution of subjectivity and human agency. This paradoxical view of tragedy as an ‘enabling obstacle’ that contests the idea of tragic destiny as inescapable determinism finds its roots in the continental philosophical and theological background of their thought but is more consistently exhibited in Niebuhr’s theological anthropology.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The slippage from the language of tragedy to the language of evil is not as illegitimate as it might seem at first glance. As Paul Ricoeur (1967, pp. 324, 314) remarks commenting on Job’s suffering, there is a circular relation between the Adamic myth of original sin and the tragic myth of the blindness of fate and ultimate unjustifiability of suffering.: ‘…only he who confesses that he is the author of evil discovers the reverse of that confession, namely, the non-posited in the positing of evil, the always already there of evil, the other of temptation, and finally the incomprehensibility of God, who tests me and who can appear to me as my enemy’. So ‘[i]t might be said that the avowal of evil as human calls forth a second-degree avowal, that of evil as non-human. Only tragedy can accept this avowal of the avowal and exhibit it in a spectacle, for no coherent discourse can include that Other’.
See here Niebuhr’s (1941, p. 259) relevant remark about Luther’s interpretation of the original sin: ‘…Luther seems to heighten the Augustinian doctrine in the interest of greater consistency but at the price of imperilling one element in the paradox, the element of human responsibility’.
For an analysis on how Niebuhr’s and Morgenthau’s republican sensibilities offer conceptual and practical resources to keep the destructive human tendencies at bay and energise the creative ones, see Tjalve (2008). However, see also here Levine’s (2012, pp. 134–135) recent criticism that Morgenthau lacks the Arendtian concept of ‘natality’ which in turn compromises his ability to imagine new repoliticising possibilities.
References
Basterra, G. (2004) Seductions of Fate: Tragic Subjectivity, Ethics, Politics. Basingstoke, UK; New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Brown, J.C. (2012) Tragedy, ‘tragic choices’ and contemporary international political theory. In: T. Erskine and N.R. Lebow (eds.) Tragedy and International Relations. Basingstoke, UK; New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 75–85.
Curtis, N. (2007) Tragedy and politics. Philosophy and Social Criticism 33 (7): 860–879.
Dienstag, F.J. (2008) Tragedy, pessimism, Nietzsche. In: R. Felski (ed.) Rethinking Tragedy. Baltimore, MD: The John Hopkins University Press, pp. 104–126.
Epp, R. (1991) The ‘Augustinian Moment’ in International Relations: Niebuhr, Butterflied, Wight and the Reclaiming of a Tradition. Aberystwyth, UK: Department of International Politics, University College of Wales. International Politics Research Paper no. 10.
Erskine, T. and Lebow, N.R. (2012) Learning from tragedy and refocusing international relations. In: T. Erskine and N.R. Lebow (eds.) Tragedy and International Relations. Basingstoke, UK; New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 185–217.
Euben, J.P. (2012) The tragedy of tragedy. In: T. Erskine and N.R. Lebow (eds.) Tragedy and International Relations. Basingstoke, UK; New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 86–96.
Frei, C. (2001) Hans J. Morgenthau: An Intellectual Biography. Baton Rouge, LA: Louisiana State University Press.
Frost, M. (2012) Tragedy, ethics and international relations. In: T. Erskine and N.R. Lebow (eds.) Tragedy and International Relations. Basingstoke, UK; New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 21–43.
Gilkey, L. (2001) On Niebuhr: A Theological Study. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
Jaspers, K. (1953) Tragedy is Not Enough. Translated by T.A.H. Reiche, T.H. Moore and W.K. Deutch London: Victor Gollancz Ltd.
Jonas, H. (1992) The Gnostic Religion: The message of the alien God and the beginnings of Christianity. London: Routledge.
Kierkegaard, S. (1980) The Concept of Anxiety: a simple psychologically orienting deliberation on the dogmatic issue of hereditary sin. Translated by R. Thomte New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Klusmeyer, D. (2009) Beyond tragedy: Hannah Arendt and Hans Morgenthau on responsibility, evil and political ethics. International Studies Review 11 (2): 332–351.
Lambropoulos, V. (2006) The Idea of the Tragic. London: Duckworth.
Lebow, N.R. (2003) The Tragic Vision of Politics: Ethics, Interests and Order. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Lebow, N.R. (2012) Tragedy, politics and political science. In: T. Erskine and N.R. Lebow (eds.) Tragedy and International Relations. Basingstoke, UK; New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 63–71.
Levine, J.D. (2012) Recovering International Relations: The Promise of Sustainable Critique. Oxford, UK; New York: Oxford University Press.
Loriaux, M. (1992) The realists and saint augustine: Skepticism, psychology, and moral action in international relations thought. International Studies Quarterly 36 (4): 401–420.
Lu, C. (2012) Tragedies and international relations. In: T. Erskine and N.R. Lebow (eds.) Tragedy and International Relations. Basingstoke, UK; New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 158–171.
Mayall, J. (2012) Tragedy, progress and the international order. In: T. Erskine and N.R. Lebow (eds.) Tragedy and International Relations. Basingstoke, UK; New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 44–52.
McNeill, W. (2000) A ‘scarcely pondered world’. The place of tragedy: Heidegger, aristotle, sophocles. In. M. de Beistegui and S. Sparks (eds.) Philosophy and Tragedy. London: Routledge, pp. 169–189.
Mearsheimer, J. (2001) The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. NY, London: W.W. Norton.
Molloy, S. (2006) The Hidden History of Realism. Basingstoke, UK; New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Molloy, S. (2009) Hans J. Morgenthau versus E. H Carr: Conflicting conceptions of ethics in realism. In: D. Bell (ed.) Political Thought and International Relations: variations on a realist theme. Oxford, UK; New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 83–104.
Morgenthau, H.J. (1945) The evil of politics and the ethics of evil. Ethics 56 (1): 1–18.
Morgenthau, H.J. (1946) Scientific Man versus Power Politics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Morgenthau, H.J. (1962) Love and power. Commentary 33 (3): 247–251.
Morgenthau, H.J. (1967) Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace. 4th edn. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
Morgenthau, H.J. (1972) Science: Servant or Master? New York: World Publishing.
Murray, J.H.A. (1996) The moral politics of hans morgenthau. The Review of Politics 58 (1): 81–107.
Neacsu, M. (2010) Hans J. Morgenthau’s Theory of International Politics: Disenchantment and Re-Enchantment. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Niebuhr, R. (1934) Reflections on the End of an Era. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.
Niebuhr, R. (1941) The Nature and Destiny of Man: a Christian interpretation. Vol. I Human Nature. London: Nisbet & Co.
Niebuhr, R. (1943) The Nature and Destiny of Man: a Christian interpretation. Vol. II Human Destiny. London: Nisbet & Co.
Niebuhr, R. (1950) A protest against a dilemma’s two horns. World Politics 2 (3): 338–344.
Niebuhr, R. (1954) Christian Realism and Political Problems. London: Faber and Faber Ltd.
Niebuhr, R. (1965) Beyond Tragedy: Essays on the Christian Interpretation of History. London and New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.
Nietzsche, F. (1993) The Birth of Tragedy: Out of the Spirit of Music. Translated by S. Whiteside London: Penguin Books.
Nietzsche, F. (2006) Thus Spoke Zarathustra: A Book for All and None. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Oakeshott, M. (1996) Scientific Politics. In: T. Fuller (ed.) Religion, Politics and Moral Life. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Patterson, E. (1999) Niebuhr and his critics: Realistic optimism in world politics. International Relations 14 (5): 47–65.
Petersen, E.U. (1999) Breathing Nietzsche’s air: New reflections on Morgenthau’s concepts of power and human nature. Alternatives 24 (1): 83–118.
Pichler, K.H. (1998) The godfather of ‘truth’: Max Weber and Carl Schmitt in Morgenthau’s theory of power politics. Review of International Studies 24 (2): 185–200.
Platten, S. (2010) Conclusion: Realism revisited. In: R. Harries and S. Platten (eds.) Reinhold Niebuhr and Contemporary Politics: God and Power. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, pp. 234–248.
Rengger, N. (2012) Tragedy or scepticism? Defending the anti-pelagian mind in world politics. In: T. Erskine and N.R. Lebow (eds.) Tragedy and International Relations. Basingstoke, UK; New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 53–62.
Rice, D. (2008) Reinhold Niebuhr and Hans Morgenthau: A friendship with contrasting shades of realism. Journal of American Studies 42 (2): 285–289.
Ricoeur, P. (1967) The Symbolism of Evil. Translated by E. Buchanan Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
Rossbach, S. (1999) Gnostic Wars: the Cold War in the Context of Western Spirituality. Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University Press.
Schelling, W.F. (1989[1859]) The Philosophy of Art. Translated by W.D. Stott. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Schmidt, D. (2001) On Germans and Other Greeks, Tragedy and Ethical Life. Bloomington & Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
Schürmann, R. (1999) Ultimate double binds. In: J. Risser (ed.) Heidegger Towards the Turn. Albany, NY: SUNY Press, pp. 243–268.
Smith, M. (1986) Realist Thought from Weber to Kissinger. Baton Rouge, LA: Louisiana State University Press.
Smith, W.T. (1995) The uses of tragedy: Reinhold Niebuhr’s theory of history and international ethics. Ethics & International Affairs 9 (1): 171–191.
Solomon, T. (2012) Human nature and the limits of the self: Hans Morgenthau on love and power. International Studies Review 14 (2): 201–224.
Spegele, R. (2009) Towards a more reflective political realism. In: D. Bell (ed.) Political Thought and International Relations: variations on a realist theme. Oxford, UK; New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 122–142.
Spirtas, M. (1996) A house divided: Tragedy and evil in realist theory. In: B. Frankel (ed.) Realism: Restatements and Renewal. London; Portland, OR: Frank Cass, pp. 385–424.
Steiner, G. (1961) The Death of Tragedy. New York: Knopf.
Strong, B.T. (2012) Nietzsche and questions of tragedy, tyranny and international relations. In: T. Erskine and N.R. Lebow (eds.) Tragedy and International Relations. Basingstoke, UK; New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 144–157.
Szondi, P. (2002) An Essay On the Tragic. Translated by P. Fleming Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Taxidou, O. (2004) Tragedy, Modernity and Mourning. Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University Press.
Tjalve, S.V. (2008) Realist Strategies of Republican Peace: Niebuhr, Morgenthau and the politics of patriotic dissent. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
Williams, M. (2004) Why ideas matter in international relations: Hans Morgenthau, classical realism, and the moral construction of politics. International Organization 58 (4): 633–665.
Acknowledgements
The author thanks Daniel Levine, Richard Ned Lebow, Tony Lang and, especially, the editors of this special issue, Sean Molloy and Hartmut Behr, for their invaluable comments on previous drafts of this article. The usual disclaimer applies.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Paipais, V. Necessary fiction: Realism’s tragic theology. Int Polit 50, 846–862 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1057/ip.2013.38
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/ip.2013.38