Skip to main content
Log in

Necessary fiction: Realism’s tragic theology

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Politics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article revisits the early realist understanding of tragedy in international relations in order to highlight its debt to continental philosophical thought and tragic theology. Far from sharing a view of tragedy as objective externality, early realists engaged with the existential conditions that make up the paradoxical structure of experience: human beings’ constant albeit frustrated striving to make the world intelligible and ascribe meaning to their actions. The upshot of this article is that early classical realists, such as Hans Morgenthau and Reinhold Niebuhr, entertained a view of tragedy as a necessary fiction, that is, a fabricated but real condition that is inextricably linked with the constitution of subjectivity and human agency. This paradoxical view of tragedy as an ‘enabling obstacle’ that contests the idea of tragic destiny as inescapable determinism finds its roots in the continental philosophical and theological background of their thought but is more consistently exhibited in Niebuhr’s theological anthropology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The slippage from the language of tragedy to the language of evil is not as illegitimate as it might seem at first glance. As Paul Ricoeur (1967, pp. 324, 314) remarks commenting on Job’s suffering, there is a circular relation between the Adamic myth of original sin and the tragic myth of the blindness of fate and ultimate unjustifiability of suffering.: ‘…only he who confesses that he is the author of evil discovers the reverse of that confession, namely, the non-posited in the positing of evil, the always already there of evil, the other of temptation, and finally the incomprehensibility of God, who tests me and who can appear to me as my enemy’. So ‘[i]t might be said that the avowal of evil as human calls forth a second-degree avowal, that of evil as non-human. Only tragedy can accept this avowal of the avowal and exhibit it in a spectacle, for no coherent discourse can include that Other’.

  2. See here Niebuhr’s (1941, p. 259) relevant remark about Luther’s interpretation of the original sin: ‘…Luther seems to heighten the Augustinian doctrine in the interest of greater consistency but at the price of imperilling one element in the paradox, the element of human responsibility’.

  3. For an analysis on how Niebuhr’s and Morgenthau’s republican sensibilities offer conceptual and practical resources to keep the destructive human tendencies at bay and energise the creative ones, see Tjalve (2008). However, see also here Levine’s (2012, pp. 134–135) recent criticism that Morgenthau lacks the Arendtian concept of ‘natality’ which in turn compromises his ability to imagine new repoliticising possibilities.

References

  • Basterra, G. (2004) Seductions of Fate: Tragic Subjectivity, Ethics, Politics. Basingstoke, UK; New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J.C. (2012) Tragedy, ‘tragic choices’ and contemporary international political theory. In: T. Erskine and N.R. Lebow (eds.) Tragedy and International Relations. Basingstoke, UK; New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 75–85.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Curtis, N. (2007) Tragedy and politics. Philosophy and Social Criticism 33 (7): 860–879.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dienstag, F.J. (2008) Tragedy, pessimism, Nietzsche. In: R. Felski (ed.) Rethinking Tragedy. Baltimore, MD: The John Hopkins University Press, pp. 104–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epp, R. (1991) The ‘Augustinian Moment’ in International Relations: Niebuhr, Butterflied, Wight and the Reclaiming of a Tradition. Aberystwyth, UK: Department of International Politics, University College of Wales. International Politics Research Paper no. 10.

  • Erskine, T. and Lebow, N.R. (2012) Learning from tragedy and refocusing international relations. In: T. Erskine and N.R. Lebow (eds.) Tragedy and International Relations. Basingstoke, UK; New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 185–217.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Euben, J.P. (2012) The tragedy of tragedy. In: T. Erskine and N.R. Lebow (eds.) Tragedy and International Relations. Basingstoke, UK; New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 86–96.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Frei, C. (2001) Hans J. Morgenthau: An Intellectual Biography. Baton Rouge, LA: Louisiana State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frost, M. (2012) Tragedy, ethics and international relations. In: T. Erskine and N.R. Lebow (eds.) Tragedy and International Relations. Basingstoke, UK; New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 21–43.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gilkey, L. (2001) On Niebuhr: A Theological Study. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaspers, K. (1953) Tragedy is Not Enough. Translated by T.A.H. Reiche, T.H. Moore and W.K. Deutch London: Victor Gollancz Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonas, H. (1992) The Gnostic Religion: The message of the alien God and the beginnings of Christianity. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kierkegaard, S. (1980) The Concept of Anxiety: a simple psychologically orienting deliberation on the dogmatic issue of hereditary sin. Translated by R. Thomte New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klusmeyer, D. (2009) Beyond tragedy: Hannah Arendt and Hans Morgenthau on responsibility, evil and political ethics. International Studies Review 11 (2): 332–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambropoulos, V. (2006) The Idea of the Tragic. London: Duckworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lebow, N.R. (2003) The Tragic Vision of Politics: Ethics, Interests and Order. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lebow, N.R. (2012) Tragedy, politics and political science. In: T. Erskine and N.R. Lebow (eds.) Tragedy and International Relations. Basingstoke, UK; New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 63–71.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Levine, J.D. (2012) Recovering International Relations: The Promise of Sustainable Critique. Oxford, UK; New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Loriaux, M. (1992) The realists and saint augustine: Skepticism, psychology, and moral action in international relations thought. International Studies Quarterly 36 (4): 401–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu, C. (2012) Tragedies and international relations. In: T. Erskine and N.R. Lebow (eds.) Tragedy and International Relations. Basingstoke, UK; New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 158–171.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mayall, J. (2012) Tragedy, progress and the international order. In: T. Erskine and N.R. Lebow (eds.) Tragedy and International Relations. Basingstoke, UK; New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 44–52.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • McNeill, W. (2000) A ‘scarcely pondered world’. The place of tragedy: Heidegger, aristotle, sophocles. In. M. de Beistegui and S. Sparks (eds.) Philosophy and Tragedy. London: Routledge, pp. 169–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mearsheimer, J. (2001) The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. NY, London: W.W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Molloy, S. (2006) The Hidden History of Realism. Basingstoke, UK; New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Molloy, S. (2009) Hans J. Morgenthau versus E. H Carr: Conflicting conceptions of ethics in realism. In: D. Bell (ed.) Political Thought and International Relations: variations on a realist theme. Oxford, UK; New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 83–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgenthau, H.J. (1945) The evil of politics and the ethics of evil. Ethics 56 (1): 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgenthau, H.J. (1946) Scientific Man versus Power Politics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgenthau, H.J. (1962) Love and power. Commentary 33 (3): 247–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgenthau, H.J. (1967) Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace. 4th edn. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgenthau, H.J. (1972) Science: Servant or Master? New York: World Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, J.H.A. (1996) The moral politics of hans morgenthau. The Review of Politics 58 (1): 81–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neacsu, M. (2010) Hans J. Morgenthau’s Theory of International Politics: Disenchantment and Re-Enchantment. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Niebuhr, R. (1934) Reflections on the End of an Era. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niebuhr, R. (1941) The Nature and Destiny of Man: a Christian interpretation. Vol. I Human Nature. London: Nisbet & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niebuhr, R. (1943) The Nature and Destiny of Man: a Christian interpretation. Vol. II Human Destiny. London: Nisbet & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niebuhr, R. (1950) A protest against a dilemma’s two horns. World Politics 2 (3): 338–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niebuhr, R. (1954) Christian Realism and Political Problems. London: Faber and Faber Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niebuhr, R. (1965) Beyond Tragedy: Essays on the Christian Interpretation of History. London and New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nietzsche, F. (1993) The Birth of Tragedy: Out of the Spirit of Music. Translated by S. Whiteside London: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nietzsche, F. (2006) Thus Spoke Zarathustra: A Book for All and None. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oakeshott, M. (1996) Scientific Politics. In: T. Fuller (ed.) Religion, Politics and Moral Life. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, E. (1999) Niebuhr and his critics: Realistic optimism in world politics. International Relations 14 (5): 47–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petersen, E.U. (1999) Breathing Nietzsche’s air: New reflections on Morgenthau’s concepts of power and human nature. Alternatives 24 (1): 83–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pichler, K.H. (1998) The godfather of ‘truth’: Max Weber and Carl Schmitt in Morgenthau’s theory of power politics. Review of International Studies 24 (2): 185–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Platten, S. (2010) Conclusion: Realism revisited. In: R. Harries and S. Platten (eds.) Reinhold Niebuhr and Contemporary Politics: God and Power. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, pp. 234–248.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rengger, N. (2012) Tragedy or scepticism? Defending the anti-pelagian mind in world politics. In: T. Erskine and N.R. Lebow (eds.) Tragedy and International Relations. Basingstoke, UK; New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 53–62.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rice, D. (2008) Reinhold Niebuhr and Hans Morgenthau: A friendship with contrasting shades of realism. Journal of American Studies 42 (2): 285–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ricoeur, P. (1967) The Symbolism of Evil. Translated by E. Buchanan Boston, MA: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossbach, S. (1999) Gnostic Wars: the Cold War in the Context of Western Spirituality. Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schelling, W.F. (1989[1859]) The Philosophy of Art. Translated by W.D. Stott. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, D. (2001) On Germans and Other Greeks, Tragedy and Ethical Life. Bloomington & Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schürmann, R. (1999) Ultimate double binds. In: J. Risser (ed.) Heidegger Towards the Turn. Albany, NY: SUNY Press, pp. 243–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M. (1986) Realist Thought from Weber to Kissinger. Baton Rouge, LA: Louisiana State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, W.T. (1995) The uses of tragedy: Reinhold Niebuhr’s theory of history and international ethics. Ethics & International Affairs 9 (1): 171–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, T. (2012) Human nature and the limits of the self: Hans Morgenthau on love and power. International Studies Review 14 (2): 201–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spegele, R. (2009) Towards a more reflective political realism. In: D. Bell (ed.) Political Thought and International Relations: variations on a realist theme. Oxford, UK; New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 122–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spirtas, M. (1996) A house divided: Tragedy and evil in realist theory. In: B. Frankel (ed.) Realism: Restatements and Renewal. London; Portland, OR: Frank Cass, pp. 385–424.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steiner, G. (1961) The Death of Tragedy. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strong, B.T. (2012) Nietzsche and questions of tragedy, tyranny and international relations. In: T. Erskine and N.R. Lebow (eds.) Tragedy and International Relations. Basingstoke, UK; New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 144–157.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Szondi, P. (2002) An Essay On the Tragic. Translated by P. Fleming Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taxidou, O. (2004) Tragedy, Modernity and Mourning. Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tjalve, S.V. (2008) Realist Strategies of Republican Peace: Niebuhr, Morgenthau and the politics of patriotic dissent. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, M. (2004) Why ideas matter in international relations: Hans Morgenthau, classical realism, and the moral construction of politics. International Organization 58 (4): 633–665.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author thanks Daniel Levine, Richard Ned Lebow, Tony Lang and, especially, the editors of this special issue, Sean Molloy and Hartmut Behr, for their invaluable comments on previous drafts of this article. The usual disclaimer applies.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Paipais, V. Necessary fiction: Realism’s tragic theology. Int Polit 50, 846–862 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1057/ip.2013.38

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/ip.2013.38

Keywords

Navigation