Skip to main content
Log in

Organizational Symbolism as a Social Construction: A Perspective from the Sociology of Knowledge

  • Published:
Human Relations

Abstract

This article describes organizational symbolismfrom a sociology of knowledge perspective and considersboth the theoretical and extra-theoretical bases of thesymbolic approach. It illustrates the distinctive principles of the symbolic approach withrespect to other methods used in the study oforganizations, the concepts on which it is based, andthe organizational issues on which it has shedsignificant light. Symbolist studies of organizations haverefocused scholarly attention on the multidisciplinaryunderstanding of the logos, ethos, and pathos oforganizational life. They have done so by stressing the production of knowledge tout court, rather thanconcerning themselves with the applicability of theorganizational knowledge acquired by this approach formanagerial purposes. Organizational symbolism is described in the article as a fluctuatingand emerging social construction whose growth and spreadhas been fostered by support within academia.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Abelson, R. Beliefs are like possessions. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 1986, 16(3), 223–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abravanel, H. Mediatory myth in the service of organizational ideology. In Pondy, L. R., Frost, P. J., Morgan, G., and Dandridge, T. C. (Eds.), Organizational symbolism. Gre enwich, CT: JAI Press, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Acker, J. Gende ring organizational theory. In Mills, A., and Tancred, P. (Eds.), Gendering organizational analysis. London: Sage, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alleau, R. La science des symboles. Paris: Payot, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alvesson, M., & Berg, P. O. Corporate culture and organizational symbolism. Be rlin: de Gruyte r, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alvesson, M., & Willmott, H. On the idea of emancipation in management and organization studies. Academ y of Managem ent Review, 1992, 17(3), 432–464.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ardigó, A. Per una sociologia oltre il post-moderno. Bari: Laterza, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barthes, R. Mythologies. Paris: Editions du Seuil, 1957 (English translation: Mythologies. London: Granada, 1973).

    Google Scholar 

  • Barthes, R. SZ. Paris: Seuil, 1970 (Italian translation: S/Z. Torino: Einaudi, 1973).

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, H. S. Outsiders: Studies in the sociology of deviance. New York: Fre e Press, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berg, P. O. Emotional structures in organizations. Lund: Studentlitteratur, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, P., & Luckmann, T. The social construction of reality. Garden City, NY: Doubleday and Co., 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumer, H. Symbolic interactionism. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boas, F. Race, language and culture. New York: MacMillan, 1948.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolognini, B. Il mito come espressione dei valori organizzativi e come fattore strutturale. In Gagliardi, P. (Ed.), Le imprese come culture. Torino: Isedi, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broms, H., & Gahmberg, H. Mythology in managem ent culture. He lsinki: He lsinki School of Economics Publications D-58, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broms, H., & Gahmberg, H. Communication to self in organizations and cultures. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1983, 28, 482–495.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryman, A. Research methods and organization studies. Boston: Unwin Hyman, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calàs, M. & Smircich, L. Re-writing gender into organizational theorizing. In Reed, M., and Hughes, M. (Eds.), Rethinking organization. London: Sage, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassirer, E. Philosophie der Symbolischen Formen (Vols. I-III). Oxford: B. Cassirer, 1923-1929.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, R. Theoretical sociology. Orlando: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1988 (Italian translation: Teorie sociologiche. Bologna: Il Mulino, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  • Crespi, F. Le vie della sociologia. Bologna: Il Mulino, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crespi, F. Manuale di sociologia della cultura. Bari: Laterza, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Czarniawska-Joerges, B. & Joerges, B. Linguistic artifacts at service of organizational control. In Gagliardi, P. (Ed.), Symbols and artifacts. Be rlin: de Gruyter, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dean, J. W., Ramirez, R., & Ottensmeyer, E. An aesthe tic perspective on organizations. In Cooper, C., and Jackson, S. (Eds.), Creating tomorrow's organ izations. Chichester: Wiley, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denzin, N. Symbolic interactionism and cultural studies. Oxford: Blackwell, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorfles, G. L'estetica del mito. Da Vico a Wittgenstein. Milano: Mursia, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, M. Implicit mean ings. Boston: Routledge, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durand, G. L'imagination symbolique. Paris: Puf, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, E. Les formes élémentaires de la vie religieuse. Paris: Alcan, 1912.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eco, U. Opera aperta. Forma e indeterminazion e nelle poetiche con temporanee. Milano: Bompiani, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, M., & March, J. Information in organization as signal and symbol. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1981, 26, 171–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrante, M., & Zan, S. Il fenomeno organizzativo. La Nuova Italia Scientifica, 1994.

  • Fineman, S. Emotion and organizing. In Clegg, S. R., Hardy, C., and Nord, W. R. (Eds.), Handbook of organization studies. London: Sage, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fineman, S. Emotion and managemen t learning. Managem ent Learning, 1997, 28(1), 13–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franzini, E., & Mazzocut-Mis, M. Estetica. Milano: Mondadori, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, J. T. An embarrassment of proper times: A foreword. In Nowotny, H. (Ed.), Time. The modern and postmodern experience. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadamer, H.-G. Die aktualität des schönen. Stuttgart: Reclam, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gagliardi, P. Exploring the aesthetic side of organizational life. In Clegg, S. R., Hardy, C., and Nord, W. R. (Eds.), Handbook of organization studies. London: Sage, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfinkel, H. Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geertz, C. The in terpretation of cultures. New York: Basic Books, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gherardi, S. Gender, symbolism and organizational cultures. London: Sage, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gherardi, S., & Strati, A. The temporal dimension in organizational studies. Organization Studies, 1988, 9(2), 149–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goetze, D. Kultur und subkultur. Kolner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 1972, 24, 583–597.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. Interaction ritual. New York: Doubleday, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golding, D. Management rituals: maintaining simplicity in the chain of command. In Linstead, S., Grafton Small, R., and Jeffcut, P. (Eds.) Understanding management. London: Sage, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goleman, D. Emotional intelligence. London: Bloomsbury, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hickson, D. J., Butler, R. J., Cray, D., Mallory, G. R., & Wilson, D. C. Top decisions: Strategic decision-making in organizations. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Höpfl, H., & Linstead, S. Introduction. Learning to feel and feeling to learn: Emotion and learning in organizations. Managem ent Learning, 1997, 28(1), 5–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Husserl, E. Ideen zu einer reinen phänom enologie und phänomenologischen philosophie. Den Haag: M. Memeye r, 1913.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacques, R. Critique and theory building. Academ y of Managem ent Review, 1992, 17(3), 582–606.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joas, H. Die kreativität des handelns. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag, 1992 (English translation: The creativity of action. Cambrige: Polity Press, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, M. O. Studying organizational symbolism. Thousands Oaks: Sage, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knorr Cetina, K. Primitive classification and postmodernity: Towards a sociological notion of fiction. Theory, Culture & Society, 1994, 11, 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kroeber, A. L., & Kluckhohn, C. Culture: A critical review of concepts and definitions. New York: Vintage, 1963 (1952).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lotman, J. Two models of communication. In Lotman, J. (e d.), Soviet semiotics. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mallarmé, S. Oeuvres complètes. Paris: Pléiade, 1945.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manheim, E. Introduction. In Mannheim, K., Essays on the sociology of culture. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. 1956.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mannheim, K. Wissenssoziologie. In Vierkandt, A. (Ed.), Handwörtenbuch der soziologie. Stuttgart: Enke, 1931.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mannheim, K. Essays on the sociology of culture. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1956.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, J. Decision s and organ izations. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, J. & Sevón, G. Gossip, information, and decision-making. In Sproull, L. S., and Larkey, P. D. (Eds.), Advan ces in in formation processing in organizations. Greenwich: JAI Press, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, J. & Frost, P. The organizational culture war games: A struggle for intellectual dominance. In Clegg, S. R., Hardy, C., & Nord, W. R. (Eds.), Handbook of organization studies. London: Sage, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, J., Feldman, M., Hatch, M. J., & Sitkin, S. The uniqueness paradox in organizational stories. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1983, 28, 438–453.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mead, G. H. Mind, self and society. Chicago: Unive rsity of Chicago Press, 1934.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mumby, D., & Putnam, L. The politics of emotion. Academ y of Managem ent Review, 1992, 17(3), 465–486.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, D. Le taylorisme dans l’industrie américaine. In de Montmollin, M., and Pastré, O. (Eds.), Le taylorism e. Paris: Editions La Découverte, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowotny, H. Eigenzeit entstehung und strukturierung eines zeitgefühls. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag, 1989 (English translation: Time. The modern and postmodern experience. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ouchi, W. A conce ptual framework for the design of organizational control me chanisms. Management Science, 1979, 25(9), 833–848.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, M. Personal knowledge. Towards a post-critical philosophy. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1958.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, M. The tacit dimension. Garde n City: Doubleday, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, M. In Grene, M. (Ed.), Knowing and being. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, L., & Mumby, D. Organizations, emotions and the myth of rationality. In Fineman, S. (Ed.), Emotion in organ izations. London: Sage, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed, M. The sociology of organizations. Themes, perspectives and prospects. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheler, M. Die wissensformen und die gesellschaft. Le ipzig: Neue Geist, 1926.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schutz, A. Collected papers (Vol. I). Den Haag: Nijhoff, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schutz, A. Collected papers (Vol. II). Den Haag: Nijhoff, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, H., & Jacobs, J. Qualitative sociology. A method to the madness. New York: Free Press, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartzman, H. B. Ethnography in organizations. Newbury Park: Sage, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selznick, P. Leadership in admin istration. New York: Harpe r and Row, 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sevón, G. Organizational imitation in identity transformation. In Czarniawska, B., and Sevón, B. (Eds.), Translatin g organizational change. Berlin: de Gruyte r, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, D. Interpreting qualitative data. London: Sage, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sims, D. Fantasies and the location of skill. In Strati, A. (Ed.), The symbolics of skill. Trento: University of Trento, Dipartimento di Politica Sociale, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sims, D., Fineman, S., & Gabriel, Y. Organizing and organizations. London: Sage, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sini, C. Il pensiero e il simbolo. In Zecchi, S. (Ed.), Forme del simbolo. Bologna: Il Mulino, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sismondo, S. Some social constructions. Social Studies of Science, 1993, 23(3), 515–553.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smircich, L. Concepts of culture and organizational analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1983, 28(3), 339–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sperber, D. Le symbolisme en général. Paris: Hermann, 1974 (English translation: Rethinking symbolism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  • Susman, G., & Evered, R. An assessment of the scientific me rits of action research. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1978, 23, 582–603.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strati, A. (ed.). The symbolics of skill. Trento: Unive rsity of Trento, Dipartimento di Politica Sociale, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strati, A. Organization culture. In Széll, G. (Ed.), Concise encyclopaedia of participation and co-managem ent. Be rlin: de Gruyter, 1992. (a)

    Google Scholar 

  • Strati, A. Aesthetic understanding of organizational life. Academy of Managem ent Review, 1992, 17(3), 568–581. (b)

    Google Scholar 

  • Strati, A. Organizations viewed through the lens of aesthe tics. Organization, 1996, 3(2), 209–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strati, A. Organization as hypertext: A me taphor from visual cultures. Studies in Cultures, Organizations and Societies, 1997, 3(2), 307–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trice, H. Rites and ce remonials in organizational cultures. Research in the Sociology of Organizations (Vol. 4), JAI Press, 1985, 4, pp. 221–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, B. Introduction. In Turner, B. (e d.), Organizational symbolism. Be rlin: de Gruyter, 1990. (a)

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, B. (ed.). Organizational symbolism. Berlin: de Gruyte r, 1990. (b)

  • Turner, V. Schism and continuity in an African society: A study of Ndembu village life. Mancheste r: Manche ste r University Press, 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, V. Dramas, fields and metaphors: Symbolic action in human society. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, V. Social dramas and stories about them. Critical Inquiry, 1980, 7, 141–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tylor, E. B. Primitive culture. London: John Murray, 1871.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Maanen, J. (ed.). Qualitative methodology. Newbury Park: Sage, 1983 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  • Vattimo, G., & Rovatti, P. A. (eds.). Il pensiero debole. Milano: Feltrinelli, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vico, G. Principi di una scienza nuova. Napoli: Mosca, 1725 (2nd Ed., 1744; reprinted, Milano: Rizzoli, 1977).

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft. Tubingen: Mohr, 1922.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. The social psychology of organizing. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. Theory construction as disciplined imagination. Academ y of Man agement Review, 1989, 14(4), 516–531.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whyte, W. F. Street corner society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1943.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkins, A. Organizational stories as symbols which control the organization. In Pondy, L. R., Frost, P. J., Morgan, G., and Dandridge, T. C. (Eds.), Organizational symbolism. Gre enwich, CT: JAI Press, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witkin, R. & Poupart, R. Running a commentary on imaginative ly re-lived events. In Strati, A. (e d.), The symbolics of skill. Trento: University of Trento, Dipartimento di Politica Sociale, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Strati, A. Organizational Symbolism as a Social Construction: A Perspective from the Sociology of Knowledge. Human Relations 51, 1379–1402 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016950400706

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016950400706

Navigation