Skip to main content
Log in

Multi-Method Triangulation in a Qualitative Study on Teachers' Practical Knowledge: An Attempt to Increase Internal Validity

  • Published:
Quality and Quantity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article describes multi-method triangulation as a means to enhance the internal validity in a qualitative study on language teachers' practical knowledge. Teachers' practical knowledge is viewed as a multi-dimensional concept, requiring multiple instruments for its exploration. In the triangulation procedure, data collected with three instruments were analysed and related to each other. Three steps of analysis, preceded by a pre-analysis step, were used to combine these data. The triangulation procedure culminated in a fairly comprehensive understanding of teachers' practical knowledge with respect to the teaching of reading comprehension to 16- to 18-year-old students. It was concluded that multi-method triangulation is a worthwhile procedure to enhance the internal validity in qualitative studies on a complex topic such as teachers' practical knowledge.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, J. R. (1980). Cognitive Psychology and Its Implications. San Francisco: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baddeley, A. (1990). Human Memory. Theory and Practice. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baddeley, A. D. & Hitch, G. (1974). Working memory. The Psychology of Learning and Motivation 8: 47-89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beijaard, D. (1990). Teaching as Acting. Doctoral dissertation. Wageningen, The Netherlands: Wageningen Agricultural University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beijaard, D. & Verloop, N. (1996). Assessing teachers' practical knowledge. Studies in Educational Evaluation 22(3): 275-286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borko, H. & Putnam, R. T. (1996). Learning to teach. In: D. C. Berliner & R. C. Calfee (eds.), Handbook of Educational Psychology. New York: Macmillan, pp. 673-708.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buitink, J. (1998). In-functie opleiden en in-functie leren van aanstaande leraren [Teaching and learning in initial in-service teacher education]. Doctoral dissertation. Groningen, The Netherlands: Rijksuniversiteit Groningen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calderhead, J. (1996). Teachers: Beliefs and knowledge. In: D. C. Berliner & R. C. Calfee (eds), Handbook of Educational Psychology. New York: Macmillan, pp. 709-725.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cantor, J., Engle, R. W. & Hamilton, G. (1991). Short-term memory, working memory, and verbal abilities: How do they relate? Intelligence 15: 229-246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, K. (1990). Teachers' knowledge and learning to teach. In: W. R. Houston (ed.), Handbook of Research on Teacher Education. New York: Macmillan, pp. 291-310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, C. M. & Peterson, P. L. (1986). Teachers' thought processes. In: M. C. Wittrock (ed.), Handbook of Research on Teaching (3rd ed). New York: Macmillan, pp. 255-296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cochran, K. F., De Ruiter, J. A. & King, R. A. (1993). Pedagogical content knowing: An integrative model for teacher preparation. Journal of Teacher Education 44(4): 263-272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, L. & Manion, L. (1994). Research Methods in Education (4th ed.). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erzberger, C. & Prein, G. (1997). Triangulation: Validity and empirically-based hypothesis construction. Quality & Quantity 31(2): 141-154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernández-Balboa, J. M. & Stiehl, J. (1995). The generic nature of pedagogical content knowledge among college professors. Teaching and Teacher Education 11(3): 293-306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gliner, J. A. (1994). Reviewing qualitative research: Proposed criteria for fairness and rigor. The Occupational Therapy Journal of Research 14(2): 78-90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, P. (1989). A study in contrast: Sources of pedagogical content knowledge for secondary English. Journal of Teacher Education 40(5): 24-31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, P. L. (1990). The Making of a Teacher: Teacher Knowledge and Teacher Education. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gudmundsdottir, S. (1991). Ways of seeing are ways of knowing. The pedagogical content knowledge of an expert English teacher. Journal of Curriculum Studies 25(5): 409-421.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoosain, R. & Salih, F. (1988). Language differences, working memory, and mathematical ability. In: M. M. Gruneberg, P. E. Morris & R. N. Sykes (eds), Practical Aspects of Memory: Current Research and Issues: Vol. 2. Clinical and Educational Implications. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 512-517.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kagan, D. M. (1990). Ways of evaluating teacher cognition: Inferences concerning the Goldilocks Principle. Review of Educational Research 60(3): 419-69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kopinak, J. (1999). The use of triangulation in a study of refugee well-being. Quality Quantity 33(2): 169-183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leinhardt, G. (1990). Capturing craft knowledge in teaching. Educational Researcher 19(2): 18-25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leinhardt, G. (1993). On teaching. In: R. Glaser (ed.), Advances in Instructional Psychology. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 1-54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marks, R. (1990). Pedagogical content knowledge: From a mathematical case to a modified conception. Journal of Teacher Education 41(3): 3-11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. E. (1981). The Promise of Cognitive Psychology. San Francisco: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meijer, P. C. (1999). Teachers' Practical Knowledge. Teaching Reading Comprehension in Secondary Education. Doctoral dissertation. Leiden, The Netherlands: Leiden University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meijer, P. C., Verloop, N. & Beijaard, D. (1999). Exploring language teachers' practical knowledge about teaching reading comprehension. Teaching and Teacher Education 15(1): 59-84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M. B. & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morine-Dershimer, G. (1992). Patterns of Interactive Thinking Associated with Alternative Perspectives on Teacher Planning. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.

  • Muhr, T. (1994). ATLAS/ti. Computer Aided Text Interpretation and Theory Building, 1.1E. Berlin, Germany.

  • Parker, W. C. (1985). Teachers' Interactive Decisions and Behaviour Utilization During Instruction. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.

  • Pedhazur, E. J. & Pedhazur-Schmelkin, L. (1991). Measurement, Design, and Analysis: An Integrated Approach. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, P. L., Fennema, E., Carpenter, T. P. & Loef, M. (1989). Teachers' pedagogical content beliefs in mathematics. Cognition and Instruction 6(1): 1-40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. T. & Borko, H. (1997). Teacher learning: Implications of new views of cognition. In: B. J. Biddle, T. L. Good & I. F. Goodson (eds), International Handbook of Teachers and Teaching (Vol. 2). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 1223-1296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. S. & Elstein, A. S. (1975). Studies on problem solving, judgment, and decision making: Implications for educational research. In: F. N. Kerlinger (ed.), Review of Research in Education (Vol. 3). Itasca, Illinois: Peacock.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. S. (1986a). Paradigms and research programs in the study of teaching: A contemporary perspective. In M. C. Wittrock (ed.), Handbook of Research on Teaching (3rd ed.). New York: Macmillan, pp. 3-36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. S. (1986b). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher 15(2): 4-14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review 57(1): 1-22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, D. (1997). Qualitative Research: Theory, Method and Practice. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smaling, A. (1987). Methodologische objectiviteit en kwalitatief onderzoek [Methodological objectivity and qualitative research]. Doctoral dissertation. Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, J. C. & Evans, G. (1985). The architecture of human information processing: Empirical evidence. Instructional Science 13: 347-359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Driel, J. H., Verloop, N. & De Vos, W. (1998). Developing science teachers' pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 35(6): 673-695.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Meijer, P.C., Verloop, N. & Beijaard, D. Multi-Method Triangulation in a Qualitative Study on Teachers' Practical Knowledge: An Attempt to Increase Internal Validity. Quality & Quantity 36, 145–167 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014984232147

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014984232147

Navigation