Skip to main content
Log in

The Problem with Token-reflexivity

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This essay presents an argument against the token-reflexive approach to the semantics for indexical languages. After some preliminary remarks in section one, sections two and three explain why some traditional arguments against token-reflexivity are ultimately ineffective. Section four puts forth a more persuasive argument, to the effect that token-reflexive views overgenerate with respect to results of analyticity. However, as section five explains, defenders of the alternative, type-oriented view have all too often wasted the advantage offered by their approach: the unmotivated, independent restriction of semantic evaluation to so-called ‘proper’ indexes is responsible for undesirable conclusions, similar to those to which token- reflexive theorists are committed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • D. Braun (1996) ArticleTitle‘Demonstratives and Their Linguistic Meaning’ Nous 30 145–173

    Google Scholar 

  • Crimmins, M.: 1995, ‘Contextuality, Reflexivity, Iteration, Logic’, in J. Tomberlin (ed.), Philosophical Perspectives 9, Ridgeview.

  • M. Garcia-Carpintero (1998) ArticleTitle‘Indexicals as Token-Reflexives’ Mind 107 529–563 Occurrence Handle10.1093/mind/107.427.529

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia-Carpintero, M.: 2000, ‘Token-Reflexivity and Indirect Discourse’, in A. Kanamori (ed.), The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy. Vol. 6: Analytic Philosophy and Logic, Philosophy Documentation Center.

  • D. Kaplan (1977) ‘Demonstratives’ J. Almog J. Perry H. Wettstein (Eds) Themes from Kaplan Oxford University Press Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Kaplan (1989) ‘Afterthoughts’ J. Almog J. Perry H. Wettstein (Eds) Themes from Kaplan Oxford University Press Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Kaplan (1990) ArticleTitle‘Words’ Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 64 IssueIDsuppl. 93–119

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Perry (1997) ‘Indexicals and Demonstratives’ C. Wright B. Hale (Eds) A Companion to the Philosophy of Language Blackwell Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, J.: 2001, Reference and Reflexivity, CSLI Publications.

  • Reichenbach, H.: 1947, Elements of Symbolic Logic, Free Press.

  • P. Schlenker (2003) ArticleTitle‘A Plea for Monsters’ Linguistics and Philosophy 26 29–120 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1022225203544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • G. Vision (1985) ArticleTitle‘I Am Here Now’ Analysis 45 198–199

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stefano Predelli.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Predelli, S. The Problem with Token-reflexivity. Synthese 148, 5–29 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-003-6194-y

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-003-6194-y

Keywords

Navigation