Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-xxrs7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-29T04:58:25.068Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Simone de Beauvoir and the Ambiguous Ethics of Political Violence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2020

Abstract

In this essay, Hutchings contends that Simone de Beauvoir's argument in The Ethics of Ambiguity provides a valuable resource for feminists currently addressing the question of the legitimacy of political violence, whether of the state or otherwise. The reason is not that Beauvoir provides a definitive answer to this question, but rather because of the ways in which she deconstructs it. In enabling her reader to appreciate ate what is presupposed by a resistant politics that adopts violence as its instrument, Beauvoir illuminates the problems encountered by the kinds of “realistic and positive” and “idealistic and moral” arguments through which the use of violence in politics is routinely justified. At the same time, Beauvoir demonstrates that to deconstruct the question of the legitimacy of violence is neither to banish nor resolve it. She does not offer a recipe for determining the legitimacy or otherwise of the use of violence in politics in general; instead, she illuminates the irremediable difficulty and inescapability of such judgments in a violent and intransigent world.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 2007 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alloo, Fatma Pande, Rekha Charlesworth, Hilary Harcourt, Wendy, Yuval‐Davis, Nira, Enloe, Cynthia, Sreberny, Annabelle, Jones, Kathleen, Sisson Runyon, Anne, Spike Peterson, V., Einhorn, Barbara, and Pettman, Jindy. 2002. Forum: The events of 11th September and beyond. International Feminist Journal of Politics 4 (1): 95113.Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah. 1969. On violence. In Crises of the republic. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Bar On, Bat‐Ami. 1991. Why terrorism is morally problematic. In Feminist ethics, ed. Card, Claudia. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
Bar On, Bat‐Ami Card, Claudia Cornell, Drucilla Jaggar, Alison, Pia Lara, Maria, Mui, Constance, and Sherene Razack, Julien S. Murphy Ruddick, Sara, and Young, Iris Marion. 2003. Forum on the war on terrorism. Hypatia 18 (1): 157231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauer, Nancy. 2001. Simone de Beauvoir, philosophy and feminism. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Beauvoir, Simone. 1948/1997. The ethics of ambiguity. Trans Frechtman, Bernard. Secaucus, N.J.: Carol Publishing Group, Citadel Press.Google Scholar
de Beauvoir, Simone. 1949/1997. The second sex. Trans Parshley, H. M. London: Vintage Press.Google Scholar
Berghoffen, Debra. 2001. Between the ethical and the political: The difference of ambiguity. In The existential phenomenology of Simone de Beauvoir, ed. O'Brien, Wendy and Embree, Lester. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Berghoffen, Debra. 2003. Simone de Beauvoir: (Re)counting the sexual difference. In Cambridge companion to Simone de Beauvoir, ed. Card, .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouatta, Cherifa. 1994. Feminine militancy: Moudjahidates during and after the Algerian war. In Gender and national identity: Women and politics in Muslim societies, ed. Moghadam, Valentine M. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Brock‐Utne, Birgit. 1985. Educating for peace: A feminist perspective on peace, research, and action. New York: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Buffachi, Vittorio. 2005. Two concepts of violence. Political Studies Review 3 (2): 193204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Card, Claudia ed., 2003. The Cambridge companion to Simone de Beauvoir. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, Berenice A. 1987. Feminism and pacifism: Historical and theoretical connections. In Women and peace: Theoretical, historical, and practical perspectives, ed. Pierson, Ruth R. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Carter, April. 1998. Should women be soldiers or pacifists? In The women and war reader, ed. Lorentzen, Lois Ann and Turpin, Jennifer. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Davies, Miranda ed., 1983. Third world—second sex: Women's struggles and national liberation. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Elshtain, Jean Bethke. 1995. Women and war, 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Elshtain, Jean Bethke. 2003. Just war against terror: The burden of American power in a violent world. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Fanon, Frantz. 1963. The wretched of the earth. Trans. Farrington, Constance. Preface by Jean‐Paul Sartre. New York: Grove Press.Google Scholar
Foster, Catherine. 1989. Women for all seasons: The story of the Women's International League for Peace and Freedom. Athens: University of Georgia Press.Google Scholar
Gatens, Moira. 2003. Beauvoir and biology: A second look. In Cambridge companion to Simone de Beauvoir, ed. Card, .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gunew, Sneja Abood, Paula Couani, Anna Kalantzis, Mary, and Khoo, Tseen. 2003. September 11 and its aftermath: Voices from Australia, Canada, and Africa. Signs 29 (2): 575–86.Google Scholar
Harris, Adrienne, and King, Ynestra, eds. 1989. Rocking the ship of state: Towards a feminist peace politics. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Heinämaa, Sara. 2003. Toward a phenomenology of sexual difference: Husserl, Merleau‐Ponty, Beauvoir. Lanham, Md.: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Hutchings, Kimberly. 2003. Hegel and feminist Philosophy. Cambridge.: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 1969. Foundations of the metaphysics of morals. Ed. Wolff, R. P. Trans. White Beck, L. Indianapolis: Bobbs‐Merrill.Google Scholar
Kruks, Sonia. 2001. Retrieving experience: Subjectivity and recognition in feminist politics. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langer, Monika. 2003. Beauvoir and Merleau‐Ponty on ambiguity. In Cambridge companion to Simone de Beauvoir, ed. Card, .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liddington, Jill. 1989. The long road to Greenham: Feminism and anti‐militarism in Britain since 1820. London: Virago.Google Scholar
Merleau‐Ponty, Maurice. 1947/1969. Humanism and terror. Trans. O'Neill, John. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Moser, Caroline O. N., and Clark, Fiona C. 2001. Victims, perpetrators, or actors? Gender, armed conflict, and political violence. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Peach, Lucinda. 1994. An alternative to pacifism? Feminism and just‐war theory. Hypatia 9 (2): 152–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roseneil, Sharon. 1995. Disarming patriarchy: Feminism and political action at Greenham. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Reardon, Betty A. 1993. Women and peace: Feminist visions of global security. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Robinson, Fiona. 1999. Globalizing care: ethics, feminist theory, and international relations. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Roundtable, . 2002. Gender and September 11. Signs 28 (1): 432–79.Google Scholar
Ruddick, Sara. 1989. Maternal thinking: Toward a politics of peace. Boston: Beacon.Google Scholar
Sartre, Jean‐Paul. 1969. Being and nothingness: An essay on phenomenological ontology. Trans. Barnes, Hazel E. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scarry, Elaine. 1985. The body in pain: The making and unmaking of the world. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sorel, Georges. 1908/1999. Reflections on violence. Ed. Jennings, Jeremy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tickner, J. Ann. 2002. Feminist perspectives on 9/11. International Studies Perspectives 3 (4): 333–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, Iris Marion. 2003. The logic of masculinist protection: Reflections on the current security state. Signs 29 (1): 125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warren, Karen, and Cady, Duane eds., 1996. Bringing peace home: Feminism, violence, and nature. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar