Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-8mjnm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-27T17:50:23.462Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Beauvoir, Hegel, War

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2020

Abstract

The importance of Hegel to the philosophy of Simone de Beauvoir, both to her early philosophical texts and to The Second Sex, is usually discussed in terms of the master-slave dialectic and a Kojève-influenced reading, which some see her as sharing with Sartre, others persuasively describe as divergent from and corrective to Sartre's. Altman shows that Hegel's influence on Beauvoir's work is also wider, both in terms of what she takes on board and what she works through and rejects, and that her reading of Hegel is crucially inflected by two additional circumstances that Sartre did not entirely share: the experience of her first serious study of Hegel as a noncombatant in Paris during the German occupation and her earlier direct exposure to an eccentric, idealist reading of Hegel as developed by the group Philosophies in connection with surrealism and the artistic avant-garde. Altman also explores the afterlife of Hegel's influence on Beauvoir on second-wave feminism in the United States and Europe, and suggests continuing relevance to feminist theory today.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 2007 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Altman, Meryl. 2002. La femme frigide dans Le deuxième sexe. In Le cinquantenaire du Deuxième sexe, ed. Chaperon, Sylvie. Paris: Syllepse.Google Scholar
Aragon, Louis. 1926/1990. Le Paysan de Paris. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
[Émile Chartier], Alain. 1939. Idées. Paris: Paul Hartmann.Google Scholar
Barthes, Roland. 1957/1970. Mythologies. Paris: Points.Google Scholar
Bauer, Nancy. 2001. Simone de Beauvoir, philosophy and feminism. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baugh, Bruce. 2003. French Hegel: From surrealism to post‐modernism. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
de Beauvoir, Simone. 1943. L'Invitée Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
de Beauvoir, Simone. 1944. Pyrrhus et Cinéas. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
de Beauvoir, Simone. 1947. Pour une Moral de l'Ambiguité (The Ethics of Ambiguity). Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
de Beauvoir, Simone. 1949. Le deuxième sexe. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
de Beauvoir, Simone. 1958. Mémoires d'une jeune fille rangée. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
de Beauvoir, Simone. 1960. La force de l’âge. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
de Beauvoir, Simone. 1990. Journal de guerre. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
de Beauvoir, Simone. 2004. Philosophical writings. Ed. Simons, Margaret. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
de Beauvoir, Simone. 2006. Diary of a philosophy student, Vol. 1, 1926–1927. Trans. and ed. Klaw, Barbara, Le Bon de Beauvoir, Sylvie, and Simons, Margaret A., with Timmerman, Marybeth. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Benjamin, Walter. 1940/2003. On the concept of history. In Selected writings, Vol. 4, 1938–1940. Trans. Jephcott, Edmund et al. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Blake, William. 1926. Premiers et seconds livres prophétiques. Trans. Berger, Pierre. Paris, Editions Rieder.Google Scholar
Bono, Paola, and Kemp, Sandra eds., 1991. Italian feminist thought: A reader. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Brodersen, Momme. 1996. Walter Benjamin. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Brown, Wendy. 1995. States of injury. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burkhard, Bud. 2000. French Marxism between the wars: Henri Lefebvre and the “Philosophies.” Amherst, N.Y.: Humanity Books.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith. 1999. Subjects of desire. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith. 2000. Antigone's claim. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Ehrenreich, Barbara. 2004. What Abu Ghraib taught me. AlterNet, May. http://www.alternet.org/story/18740/.Google Scholar
Eribon, Didier. 1999. Réflections sur la question gay. Paris: Fayard.Google Scholar
L'Esprit. 1926. Trans. Wahl, Jean. Paris: F. Rieder.Google Scholar
Firestone, Shulamith. 1971. The dialectic of sex: The case for feminist revolution. New York: Bantam.Google Scholar
Fox, Nik Farrell. 2003. The new Sartre. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Friedan, Betty. 1963/2001. The feminine mystique. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Göthlin, Eva. 2002. Lire Simone de Beauvoir à la lumière de Heidegger. In Les Temps Modernes, no. 619 (June–July).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harding, Sandra. 1986. The science question in feminism. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Heckman, John. 1974. Introduction, Jean Hyppolite, Genesis and structure of Hegel's Phenomenology of spirit. Trans. Cherniak, Samuel and Heckman, John. Evanston, Ill.: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. 1807/1977. Phenomenology of spirit. Trans. Miller, A. V. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Heinämaa, Sara. 2003. Toward a phenomenology of sexual difference: Husserl, Merleau‐Ponty, Beauvoir. Lanham, Md.: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Hutchings, Kimberley. 2003. Hegel and feminist philosophy. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Hyppolite, Jean. 1979. Genesis and structure of Hegel's Phenomenology of spirit Evanston, Ill.: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, Barbara. 2003. Mother tongues: Sexuality, trials, motherhood, translation. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kelly, Michael. 1981. Hegel in France to 1940: A bibliographic essay. Journal of European Studies 11 (41): 2952.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kierkegaard, Søren. 1843/1950. Fear and trembling–Repetition, Kierkegaard's writings, VI. Trans. Hong, Howard V. and Hong, Edna H. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kierkegaard, Søren. 1846/1960. Concluding unscientific postscript. Trans. Swenson, David F. and Lowrie, Walter. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Alexandre, Koyré. 1931. Rapport sur l’état des études hégéliennes en France. In Revue d'histoire de la philosophie 5 (2): 147–71.Google Scholar
Kruks, Sonia. 2005. Simone de Beauvoir and the politics of privilege. Hypatia 20 (1): 126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Le Doeuff, Michèle. 1991. Hipparchia's choice: An essay concerning women, philosophy, etc. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Le Doeuff, Michèle. 1998. Le Sexe du savoir. Paris: Aubier.Google Scholar
Lefebvre, Henri. 1947/1991. The critique of everyday life. Trans. Moore, John. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Lefebvre, Henri. 1973. La Somme et le reste. Paris: Belibaste.Google Scholar
Lefebvre, Henri., and Guterman, Norbert. 1933. La mystification: notes pour une critique de la vie quotidienne. Avant-Poste, no. 1 (June).Google Scholar
Limat‐Letellier, Nathalie. 2003. Hypothèses sur ‘le goût insensé de la mystification et du désespoir.’ In Une tornade d‘énigmes: Le Paysan de Paris de Louis Aragon, ed. Halperin, Anne‐Élisabeth and Trouve, Alain. Paris: Editions Improviste.Google Scholar
Lonzi, Carla. 1974. Sputiamo su Hegel, la donna clitoridea, e la donna vaginale, e altri scritti. Milan: Scritti di Rivolta Femminile.Google Scholar
Lundgren‐Göthlin, Eva. 1996. Sex and existence: Simone de Beauvoir's The second sex. Trans. Shenck, Linda. Middletown, Conn.: Wesleyan University Press.Google Scholar
Millett, Kate. 1970/2000. Sexual Politics. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Mills, Patricia Jagentowicz ed., 1998. Feminist reinterpretations of Hegel. State College: Penn State Press.Google Scholar
Moi, Toril. 1994. Simone de Beauvoir: The making of an intellectual woman. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Moi, Toril. 2000. What is a woman? And other essays. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Morgan, Robin. 1970. Sisterhood is powerful. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Ortner, Sherry B. 1972. Is female to male as nature is to culture? Feminist Studies 1 (2): 531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rötzer, Florian. 1986. Französische Philosophen im Gespräch. Munich: Klaus Boer Verlag.Google Scholar
Rubin, Gayle. 1975. The traffic in women: Notes on the “political economy” of sex. In Toward an anthropology of women, ed. Reiter, Rayna. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
Rubio, Emmanuel. 2003. “Hegel, l'Amour et le Paysan de Paris,” les Actes du Colloque de Lyon, December 2001, “le dix‐neuvième siècle d'Aragon,” Presses Universitaires de Provence. http://perso.wanadoo.fr/luc.vigier/ERITA/EDITO/erubio.htm.Google Scholar
Sartre, Jean‐Paul. 1945. Huis clos. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Simons, Margaret A. 1999. Beauvoir and The Second Sex: Feminism, race, and the origins of existentialism. Lanham, Md.: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Trebitsch, Michel. 1987a. Les mésaventures du groupe Philosophies. In Revue des revues (Spring): 69.Google Scholar
Trebitsch, Michel. 1987b. Le Group “Philosophies,” de Max Jacob aux surréalistes, 1924–25. Cahiers de l'institut de l'histoire du temps present, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (November): 2938.Google Scholar
Trebitsch, Michel. 1991. Introduction. Henri Lefebvre, Critique of everyday life. Trans. Moore, John. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Vintges, Karen. 1996. Philosophy as passion: The thinking of Simone de Beauvoir. Trans. Lavelle, Anne. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Wahl, Jean. 1926. Étude sur le Parménide de Platon (Collection de philosophie et de mystique dirigée par Pierre Morhange). Paris: F. Rieder.Google Scholar
Wahl, Jean. 1929. Le malheur de la conscience dans la philosophie de Hegel. Paris: Les editions Rieder.Google Scholar