Skip to main content
Log in

Indigenous Self-Determination and the Legitimacy of Sovereign States

  • Article
  • Published:
International Politics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Self-determination is the cardinal right sought by Indigenous peoples and in practice it may require states to accept divisible sovereignty. For most states, self-determination is framed by decolonization and is applicable to Indigenous peoples only in limited senses of self-government within state structures. Self-determination, however, is enshrined in key human rights documents and by denying Indigenous peoples the right to it, they jeopardize the legitimacy of the human rights regime, and the legitimacy of the United Nations as a source of progressive international law. They also widen the rift between international and world society raising important questions for the legitimacy of the sovereignty system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alfred, T. (1999) Peace, Power, Righteousness: An Indigenous Manifesto, Ontario: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alfred, T. (2005a) Wasáse: Indigenous Pathways of Freedom and Action, Toronto: Broadview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alfred, T. (2005b) ‘Sovereignty’, in J. Baker (ed.) Sovereignty Matters: Locations of Contestation and Possibility in Indigenous Struggles for Self-Determination, Lincoln and London: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anaya, S.J. (1996) Indigenous Peoples in International Law, New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anaya, S.J. (2005) ‘Review Article’, American Journal of International Law 99 (1): 306–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asch, M. (2004) ‘Sovereignty, Self-Determination and Treaties: Resolving Political Relations between First Nations and Canada’, unpublished paper.

  • Barker, J. (2005) ‘For Whom Sovereignty Matters’, in J. Baker (ed.) Sovereignty Matters: Locations of Contestation and Possibility in Indigenous Struggles for Self-Determination, Lincoln and London: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borrows, J. (2005) ‘Practical Recolonisation?’ University of New South Wales Law Journal 28 (3): 614–645.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, F. (1995) One Land One Nation: Mabo-Towards 2001, St Lucia: University of Queensland Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brownlie, I. (1966) The Principles of Public International Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cobo, J.M. (1986/7) Study of the Problem against Indigenous Populations, vol. v, Conclusions, Proposals and Recommendations, UN Doc E/CN 4/Sub 2 1986/7, Add, 4 para 379.

  • Ghai, Y. (2003) ‘Personal correspondence from Professor Yash Ghai to Mr Anthony J. Regan, December 3.

  • Hughes, L. (2003) The No-Nonsense Guide to Indigenous Peoples, London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inayatullah, N. and Blaney, D. (2004) International Relations and the Problem of Difference, New York and London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kingsbury, B. (1992) ‘Claims by Non-State Groups in International Law’, Cornell International Law Journal 25 (3): 481–513.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kingsbury, B . (1999) ‘The Applicability of the International Legal Concept of “Indigenous Peoples” in Asia’, in J.R. Bauer and D.A Bell (eds.) The East Asia Challenge For Human Rights, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, M . (2004) ‘Political Legitimacy and Indigenous Peoples’, unpublished paper presented to the Demcon conference, University of Victoria, BC, October 2–3.

  • Morris, G.T. (2003) ‘Vine Deloria, Jr., and the Development of a Decolonizing Critique of Indigenous Peoples and International Relations’, in R.A Grounds, G.F Tinker and D.E. Wilkins (eds.) Native Voices: American Indian Identity and Resistance, Lawrence, Kansas: University Press of Kansas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niezen, R. (2003) The Origins of Indigenism: Human Rights and the Politics of Identity, Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, M. (1986) International Law, 2nd edn, Cambridge: Grotius Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, G.J. (1996) ‘The Diffusion of Sovereignty: Self-Determination in the Post-Colonial Age’, Stanford Journal of International Law 32 (2): 255–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tully, J. (1995) Strange Multiplicity: Constitutionalism in an Age of Diversity, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, D. (2001) ‘Vision: Toward an Understanding of Aboriginal Sovereignty’, in R. Beiner and W. Norman (eds.) Canadian Political Philosophy: Contemporary Reflections, Ontario: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Keal, P. Indigenous Self-Determination and the Legitimacy of Sovereign States. Int Polit 44, 287–305 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ip.8800189

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ip.8800189

Keywords

Navigation