Abstract
Thinking about the future of humankind and the basis of political association in the early years of the twenty-first century does not give grounds for optimism. In particular, 9/11 has become a moment associated with a return to empire, geopolitics, political violence and the primacy of sovereignty. Yet, it is easy to overstate the meaning of 9/11 and exaggerate from one set of historical experiences. This article explores the ways in which the twentieth century set down key political and legal ‘cosmopolitian steps’ toward a transformation of the global order. These steps are explored and defended, and it is shown how they created the grounds for a very different response to 9/11 to the one persued by President Bush and Prime Minister Blair. Although clearly this opportunity has been temporarily lost, the failure of the Blair–Bush War on Terror reaffirms strong reasons for further developing a cosmopolitian global order.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barnett, A., Held, D. and Henderson, C. (eds.) (2005) Debating Globalization. Cambridge: Polity.
Brunkhorst, H. (2005) Solidarity: From Civic Friendship to a Global Legal Community. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Bull, H. (1977) The Anarchical Society. London: Macmillan.
Crawford, J. and Marks, S. (1998) The global democracy deficit: An essay on international law and its limits. In: D. Archibugi, D. Held and M. Köhler (eds.) Re-imagining Political Community: Studies in Cosmopolitan Democracy. Cambridge: Polity Press, pp. 72–90.
Habermas, J. (1996) Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Cambridge: Polity.
Habermas, J. (1999) Bestialität und Humanität. Die Zeit 18 April.
Heater, D. (2002) World Citizenship. London: Continuum.
Held, D. (1995) Democracy and the Global Order: From the Modern State to Cosmopolitan Governance. Cambridge: Polity.
Held, D. (2002) Law of states, law of peoples: Three models of sovereignty. Legal Theory 8 (1): 1–44.
Held, D. (2004) Global Covenant: The Social Democratic Alternative to the Washington Consensus. Cambridge: Polity.
Held, D. and Kaldor, M. (2001) What hope for the future? http://www.lse.ac.uk/depts/global/maryheld.htm, accessed 8 December 2008.
Hoffmann, S. (2003) America goes backward. New York Review of Books 50 (10): 74–80.
Ikenberry, J. (2005) A weaker world. Prospect November.
Kaldor, M. (1998) New and Old Wars. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Kingsolver, B. (2001) A pure, high note of anguish. Los Angeles Times 23 September.
Kirgis, F. (2001) Terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon. The American Society of international Law, September 2001, http://www.asil.org/insights/insigh77.htm.
Solana, J. (2003) The future of transatlantic relations. Progressive Politics 2 (2), http://www.policy-network.net/uploadedFiles/Publications/Publications/pp2.2%2060-67_SOLANA.pdf.
Soros, G. (2006) The Age of Fallibility: Consequences of the War on Terror. New York: Public Affairs.
Weller, M. (1997) The reality of the emerging universal constitutional order: Putting the pieces together. Cambridge Review of International Studies X (Winter/Spring): 40–63.
Acknowledgements
This text was presented as a plenary lecture at the Political Studies Association, Manchester, 8 April 2009.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Held, D. Cosmopolitanism after 9/11. Int Polit 47, 52–61 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1057/ip.2009.27
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/ip.2009.27