Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-16T09:41:33.993Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - Foundations beyond law

from Part II - Interconnections

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2012

Conor Gearty
Affiliation:
London School of Economics and Political Science
Costas Douzinas
Affiliation:
Birkbeck College, University of London
Get access

Summary

For many, the fall of the Berlin Wall and the end of the Cold War marked the triumph of human rights (discourse) and the inauguration of a new era which, in allusion to a term coined by American legal philosopher Ronald Dworkin, could be described as the ‘rights’ empire’. This ‘empire’ denoted, of course, not a reality in which all human beings did, in fact, enjoy the state of being represented by human rights, such as a life in dignity, civil and political liberties, the rule of law and democracy, and a (certain) degree of social welfare. Rather, it signified a discursive hegemony that turned human rights discourse into the common currency of a globalising world. In fact, the impressive expansion of the international human rights regime, and the proliferation of new constitutions with ample bills of rights in Central and Eastern Europe, Sub-Saharan Africa and Latin America have turned ‘rights-talk’ into the predominant instrument for defining and defending personal and collective identities. This does not, of course, allude to the reality behind rights-talk, which remains at best ambivalent, but to the fact that human rights has come to enjoy a near monopoly on emancipatory and utopian discourse in a post-communist and post-industrialist era.

Who owns human rights (discourse)?

Whoever seeks liberation from any type of real or perceived oppression couches his or her claims in the language of human rights. Whoever aspires to live out his or her particular identity also expresses this desire in human rights terms. Individuals and groups across the globe use human rights to articulate their claim for better lives. As such, they have at once become one of the defining discourses of globalised (post)modernity and an expression of its hubris. In their dominant interpretation they represent the ongoing process of emancipation and differentiation by individuals from social norms and governmental power that has become the hallmark of liberal democracy and market-based capitalism. Yet, they have also been at the heart of critiques of a ‘Western’ modernity that is seen to over-emphasise liberty over responsibility, individuals over nations, markets and competition over community and solidarity.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Dembour, M.-B., Who Believes in Human Rights? Reflections on the European Convention (Cambridge University Press 2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Douzinas, C., The End of Human Rights (Oxford: Hart 2000)Google Scholar
Evans, T., Human Rights Fifty Years On (Manchester University Press 1998)Google Scholar
Gearty, C., Are Human Rights Universal? (London: Cameron May 2008)Google Scholar
Goldoni, M. and McCorkindale, C., Hannah Arendt and the Law (Oxford: Hart 2012)Google Scholar
Henkin, L., The Age of Rights (New York: Columbia University Press 1990)Google Scholar
Hoffmann, F., ‘Shooting in the Dark: Reflections towards a Pragmatic Theory of Human Rights (Activism)’ (2006) 41 (3) Texas International Law Journal403–14Google Scholar
Hoffmann, F. ‘Human Rights, the Self, and the Other: Reflections on a Pragmatic Theory of Human Rights’, in Orford, A. (ed.), International Law and Its Others (Cambridge University Press 2006)Google Scholar
Ishay, M., The History of Human Rights: From Ancient Times to the Globalization Era, 2nd edn (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press 2008)Google Scholar
Meckled-García, S. and Çali, B., The Legalization of Human Rights (New York: Routledge 2006)Google Scholar
Pennington, K., The Prince and the Law 1200–1600: Sovereignty and Rights in the Western Legal Tradition (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press 1993)Google Scholar
Rorty, R., ‘Human Rights, Rationality and Sentimentality’, in Shute, S. and Hurley, S. (eds.), On Human Rights: The Oxford Amnesty Lectures 1993, 1994 (Oxford University Press 1994)Google Scholar
Dworkin, R., Law’s Empire (Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press 1986)Google Scholar
Douzinas, C., The End of Human Rights (Oxford: Hart 2000)Google Scholar
Henkin, L., The Age of Rights (New York: Columbia University Press 1990)Google Scholar
the critical essays in Gibney, M. (ed.), Globalizing Rights (Oxford University Press 2003)
Evans, T., Human Rights Fifty Years On (Manchester University Press 1998)Google Scholar
Gearty, C., Can Human Rights Survive? (Cambridge University Press 2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, R. A., Human Rights in the ‘War on Terror’ (Cambridge University Press 2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffmann, F., ‘The Dignity of ‘Terrorists’, in Hoffman, F. and Mégret, F. (eds.), Dignity: A Framework for Vulnerable Groups, Report to the Swiss Initiative to Commemorate the 60th Anniversary of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (2010)
Gallie, W. B., ‘Essentially Contested Concepts’ (1956) 56 Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society167–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meckled-García, S. and Çali, B., ‘Lost in Translation: The Human Rights Ideal and International Human Rights Law’, in Meckled-García, S. and Çali, B., The Legalization of Human Rights (New York: Routledge 2006) 11–31Google Scholar
Hoffman, F. and Mégret, F. (eds.), ‘Introduction’, in Hoffmann, F. and Mégret, F. (eds.), Dignity: A Framework for Vulnerable Groups 1–6
Luhmann, N., Law as a Social System (Oxford University Press 2004)Google Scholar
Hart, H. L. A.The Concept of Law, 2nd edn (Oxford University Press 1994)Google Scholar
Alexy, R., A Theory of Constitutional Rights (Rivers, J., trans.) (Oxford University Press 2009)Google Scholar
Fagan, A., Human Rights: Confronting Myths and Misunderstandings (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar 2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teubner, G., Law as an Autopoietic System (Oxford: Wiley–Blackwell 1993)Google Scholar
Hoffmann, F., ‘Facing the Abyss: International Law Before the Political’, in Goldoni, M. and McCorkindale, C. (eds.), Hannah Arendt and the Law (Oxford: Hart 2012)Google Scholar
Douzinas, The End of Human Rights 23 ff. and, generally, Tierney, B., The Idea of Natural Rights: Studies on Natural Rights, Natural Law and Church Law1150–1625 (Atlanta, GA: Scholars Press 1997)Google Scholar
Minogue, K., ‘The History of the Idea of Human Rights’, in Laqueur, W. and Rubin, B., The Human Rights Reader (New York: Temple University Press 1979) 3–17Google Scholar
Gearty, C., Are Human Rights Universal? (London: Cameron May 2008)Google Scholar
Alston, P., Steiner, H. J. and Goodman, R., International Human Rights in Context, 3rd edn (Oxford University Press 2007)Google Scholar
Ishay, M., The History of Human Rights from Ancient Times to the Globalization Era, 2nd edn (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press 2008)Google Scholar
Neier, A., The International Human Rights Movement: A History (Princeton University Press 2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, J., Only Paradoxes to Offer: French Feminists and the Rights of Man (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press 1996)Google Scholar
Paine, T., The Rights of Man (Mineola, NY: Dover 1999)Google Scholar
Habermas, J., Between Facts and Norms (Cambridge: Polity 1997)Google Scholar
Sweet, W. (ed.), Philosophical Theory and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (University of Ottawa Press 2003)
Berman, H., Law and Revolution: The Formation of the Western Legal Tradition (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press 1983)Google Scholar
Pennington, K., The Prince and the Law 1200–1600: Sovereignty and Rights in the Western Legal Tradition (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press 1993)Google Scholar
Coleman, J., The Individual in Political Theory and Practice (Alderley: Clarendon Press 1996)Google Scholar
Laclau, E., New Reflections on the Revolution of Our Time (New York: Verso, 1990)Google Scholar
Emancipations (New York: Verso 1996)
Winch, P., The Idea of a Social Science and its Relation to Philosophy (New York: Routledge 2007)Google Scholar
Lyotard, J.-F., The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge (University of Minnesota Press 1984)Google Scholar
Geertz, C., The Interpretation of Cultures (New York: Basic Books 1977)Google Scholar
Bloom, H., A Map of Misreading (Oxford University Press 1975)Google Scholar
Weber, M., Economy and Society (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press 1992)Google Scholar
Laclau, E. and Mouffe, C., Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics, 2nd edn (London: Verso 2001)Google Scholar
Purvis, T. and Hunt, A., ‘Discourse, Ideology, Discourse, Ideology, Discourse, Ideology . . .’ (1993) 44 British Journal of Sociology473–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×