Abstract
The events of September 11th have led to massive increases in personal, commercial, and governmental expenditures on anti-terrorism strategies, as well as a proliferation of programs designed to fight terrorism. These increases in spending and program development have focused attention on the most significant and central policy question related to these interventions: Are these programs effective? To explore this question, this study reports the results of a Campbell Collaboration systematic review on evaluation research of counter-terrorism strategies. Not only did we discover an almost complete absence of evaluation research on counter-terrorism interventions, but from those evaluations that we could find, it appears that some interventions either did not achieve the outcomes sought or sometimes increased the likelihood of terrorism occurring. The findings dramatically emphasize the need for government leaders, policy makers, researchers, and funding agencies to support both outcome evaluations of these programs as well as efforts to develop an infrastructure to foster counter-terrorism evaluation research.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abadie, A. & Gardeazabal, J. (2001). The economic costs of conflict: A case control study for the Basque Country. NEBR Working Paper 8478. Cambridge, MA.
Barros, C. P. (2003). An intervention analysis of terrorism: The Spanish Eta case. Defence and Peace Economics 14(6), 401–412.
Bisson, J. & Andrew, M. (2005). Psychological treatment of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Issue 3. Art. No.: CD003388.pub2. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003388.pub2.
Boruch, Robert F., Snyder, B. & DeMoya, D. (2000). The importance of randomized field trials. Crime and Delinquency 46, 156–180.
Brophy-Baermann, B. & Conybeare, J. A. (1994). Retaliating against terrorism: Rational expectations and the optimality of rules versus discretion. American Journal of Political Science 38(1), 196–210.
Cauley, J. & Im, E. (1988). Intervention policy analysis of skyjackings and other terrorist incidents. The American Economic Review 78(2), 27–31.
Congressional Budget Office. (2002). The budget and economic outlook: Fiscal years 2003 to 2012. Washington, DC: Congress of the United States.
Congressional Budget Office. (2005). The budget and economic outlook: Fiscal years 2006 to 2015. Washington, DC: Congress of the United States.
Cook, T. & Campbell, D. (1979). Quasi-experimentation: Design and analysis issues for field settings. Chicago: Rand McNally.
Crenshaw, M. (1992). Current research on terrorism: The academic perspective. Studies in Conflict and Terrorism 15(1), 1–11.
Enders, W. & Sandler, T. (1993). The effectiveness of antiterrorism policies: A vector–autoregression–intervention analysis. The American Political Science Review 87(4), 829–844.
Enders, W. & Sandler, T. (2000). Is transnational terrorism becoming more threatening? Journal of Conflict Resolution 44, 307–332.
Enders, W., Sandler, T., & Cauley, J. (1990). UN conventions, terrorism, and retaliation in the fight against terrorism: An econometric evaluation. Terrorism and Political Violence 2(1), 83.
Farrington, D. (2003). Methodological quality standards for evaluation research. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 587(1), 49–68.
Farrington, D. & Petrosino, A. (2001). The Campbell Collaboration Crime and Justice Group. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 58, 35–49.
Guinnessy, J. & Dawson, P. (2002). Terrorism drives Bush R and D money to defense and NIJ; The science funding flat in fiscal 2003. Physics Today 55, 30.
Halkides, M. (1995). How not to study terrorism. Peace Review 7, 253–260.
Hoffman, B. (1992). Current research on terrorism and low-intensity conflict. Studies in Conflict and Terrorism 15, 25–37.
Independent Commission on Policing in Northern Ireland (Patten Commission). 1999. A New Beginning: Policing in Northern Ireland.
Issues in Science and Technology (Report). (2002). Federal R and D in FY 2002 will have biggest percentage gain in 20 years. Issues in Science and Technology 18, 23.
Jefferson T., Demicheli, V., Deeks J., Graves, P., Pratt, M. & Rivetti, D. (1998). Vaccines for preventing anthrax. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Issue 1. Art. No.: CD000975. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000975.
Kennedy, L. & Lum, C. (2003). Developing a foundation for policy relevant terrorism research in criminology. Prepared for the Center for the Study of Public Security, Rutgers University, Newark, New Jersey.
Landes, W. M. (1978). An economic study of U.S. aircraft hijackings, 1961–1976. Journal of Law and Economics 21, 1–31.
Lipsey, M. & Wilson, D. (2001). Practical meta-analysis. Applied social research methods series 49. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Macilwain, C. (2002). Bush goes to war as budget boosts R and D. Nature 415, 564.
Merari, A. (1991). Academic research and government policy on terrorism. In C. McCauley (Ed.), Terrorism research and public policy. London: Frank Cass.
Miller, R. (1988). The literature of terrorism. Terrorism 11, 63–87.
Prunckun, H. & Mohr, P. (1997). Military deterrence of international terrorism: An evaluation of Operation El Dorado Canyon. Studies in Conflict and Terrorism 20, 267–280.
Romano, T. (1984). Terrorism: An analysis of the literature. Dissertation, Fordham University, Department of Sociology, Criminology and Penology.
Rose, S., Bisson, J., Churchill, R. & Wessely, S. (2002). Psychological debriefing for preventing post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Issue 2. Art. No.: CD000560. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000560.
Schmid, A. P. & Jongman, A. J. (1988). Political terrorism: A new guide to actors, authors, concepts, databases, theories and literature. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company.
Shadish, W., Cook, T. & Campbell, D. (2002). Experimental and quasi- experimental designs for generalized causal inferences. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
Sherman, L. W. (2005). Enlightened Justice: Reducing Human Misery through Empirical Consequentialism. Presidential Panel at the 14th World Congress of Criminology. Philadelphia, PA.
Sherman, L. W., Schmidt, J. D. & Rogan, D. P. (1992). Policing domestic violence: Experiments and dilemmas. New York: Free Press.
Sherman, L. W., Gottfredson, D., MacKenzie, D. L., Eck, J., Reuter, P. & Bushway, S. (1997). Preventing crime: What works, what doesn’t, what’s promising: A report to the United States Congress. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
Sherman, L. W., Farrington, D. P., Welsh, B. C. & MacKenzie, D. L. (Eds.). (2002). Evidence based crime prevention. London: Routledge.
Silke, A. (ed.). (2004). Research on terrorism: Trends, achievements and failures. New York: Taylor and Francis.
Silke, A. (2005). Fire of Iolaus: The role of state counter-measures in causing terrorism and what needs to be done. In T. Bjorgo (Ed.), Root causes of terrorism: Myths, reality and ways forward. Oxford, UK: Routledge.
Stein, D. J., Zungu-Dirwayi, N., van der Linden, G. J. H. & Seedat, S. (2000). Pharmacotherapy for post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Issue 4. Art. No.: CD002795. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002795.
Telhami, S. (2002). The Stakes: American in the Middle East - The Consequences of Power and the Choice for Peace. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Welsh, B. & Farrington, D. (2006). Closed-Circuit Television Surveillance. In B. Welsh & D. Farrington (Eds.), Preventing crime: What works for children, offenders, victims, and places. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
Wilkinson, P. (1977). Terrorism and the liberal state. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
Wilkinson, P. (1986). Terrorism and the Liberal State, rev. ed. London: Macmillan.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lum, C., Kennedy, L.W. & Sherley, A. Are counter-terrorism strategies effective? The results of the Campbell systematic review on counter-terrorism evaluation research. J Exp Criminol 2, 489–516 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-006-9020-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-006-9020-y